![](./images/smilies/spacer.gif)
![](./images/smilies/spacer.gif)
![](./images/smilies/spacer.gif)
![](./images/smilies/spacer.gif)
![](./images/smilies/spacer.gif)
![](./images/smilies/spacer.gif)
![Surprised :o](./images/smilies/icon_surprised.gif)
![](./images/smilies/spacer.gif)
![](./images/smilies/spacer.gif)
Moderators: IMOC Moderators, IMOC Committee Members
tonigmr2 wrote:Twin exhaust TT about a 2004 model.![]()
Tried to monster my R34GTR on a dual carriageway up to a motorway.
![]()
Stayed with me in 1st and the start of 2nd
(a weak point on the GTR I've always thought) but by the time I got into third he seemed to be standing still.
![]()
![]()
![]()
Have TTs got crap mid-range I wonder?
johnp wrote:The higher power 1.8 turbos have quite a few differences including twin intercoolers and a simple remap gives about 260/270 bhp.The V6 cars are not really any faster than 225's due to the extra weight.
I have one of the(on paper) fastest models of the mk1 TT range,the 05/06 Quattro Sport,rated at 240ps and lightened
(back seats removed
,etc).Not super quick but fast enough for most situations,good torque and easy to get 35+ mpg.
http://www.channel4.com/4car/di/audi/tt/1061/1
(Don't take any notice of what this idiot says about the seats,they are Recaro Pole Position and great.
![]()
![]()
)
matt_mr2t wrote:johnp wrote:The higher power 1.8 turbos have quite a few differences including twin intercoolers and a simple remap gives about 260/270 bhp.The V6 cars are not really any faster than 225's due to the extra weight.
I have one of the(on paper) fastest models of the mk1 TT range,the 05/06 Quattro Sport,rated at 240ps and lightened
(back seats removed
,etc).Not super quick but fast enough for most situations,good torque and easy to get 35+ mpg.
http://www.channel4.com/4car/di/audi/tt/1061/1
(Don't take any notice of what this idiot says about the seats,they are Recaro Pole Position and great.
![]()
![]()
)
Would you recommend a TT as a reliable, day to day useable car?
I've long since admired the TT& 350Z roadsters.
johnp wrote:What power do you think you are running at the moment,Toni?
johnp wrote:These little games don't mean much.He probably started off fast and if you had let him go he can say to his mates'I beat a Skyline'.
.
.
.but as soon as he realised you were going for it he
(wisely) backed off.
tonigmr2 wrote:johnp wrote:What power do you think you are running at the moment,Toni?
Stage 1(intake and exhaust plus 1bar ECU) so around 400bhp.
![]()
Yes I know it's in a different performance league, I just couldn't believe how much.
johnp wrote:quote]
Just to put it into perspective Toni, my tubby destroyed my mates Escort Cosworth by 2+ seconds 5 times in a row at Santa pod one year.Escort Cossies are generally quicker than Audi TT's and I'd say your Skyline would be quicker than my tubby was
![]()
![]()
I really like the TT's but I wouldnt expect anything other than humilliation from a Skyline.Even a standard one.
RobCrezz wrote:They can get near 300bhp with a remap though.
todd wrote:RobCrezz wrote:They can get near 300bhp with a remap though.
Simple remap will not get you 300 on a TT.
300bhp on a 225, needing a hybrid turbo and a uprated manifold as a minimum.
Ran one for a year and with a remap was sitting at 265bhp,good cars and with some sensible mods can be made to be very good cars
![]()
http://www.tt-forum.co.uk/great site with invaluable info.
![]()
Make sure the timing belt and water pump has been done, ARBs prone to going at the front and also make sure all the gauges work on the dash pod, if not they will get replaced FOC by Audi
matt_mr2t wrote:Are the turbo's on them unique to VAG engines, like our CT's are unique to Toyota engines? Or are they standard fitment Garret or similar?
todd wrote:RobCrezz wrote:They can get near 300bhp with a remap though.
Simple remap will not get you 300 on a TT.